The Dhaka Times Desk Currently, the popularity of nuclear power is on the decline. There are many reasons for this. Japan is gradually winding down its nuclear projects due to earthquakes and tsunamis. However, Bangladesh is going to enter nuclear power again. An observational text of this period in Kolkata is presented today.
Nuclear power is environmentally friendly. However, nuclear reactors are not even close to Tentun in terms of production cost and longevity.
Have you heard of David Schumacher? Well, this is the F-One hero, none other than the currently comatose Michael Schumacher. This gentleman produced docu-films, his name was brought up in the first place to talk about one of his docu-films.
The name of that film is 'The New Fire'. Those who have seen it, must know. And for those who haven't seen it, suffice it to say that the film's poster features an image of a nuclear reactor, literally a nuclear reactor, wrapped in lush green vines and leaves. That is, David Schumacher wants to say that the nuclear power of the new age is difficult to come by now. The reason is that it can provide green and clean energy. That is, environmentally friendly energy.
A very learned man is David Schumacher. Columbia University or suppose the World Economic Forum is photographing him. He wants to say in this film that it is time to change the conventional idea that nuclear power is bad for the environment. A new generation of nuclear technologists is reporting how beneficial this electricity is for the environment.
The reason for this is that the demand for environmentally friendly energy that we have to seek is very real. The whole world is now looking for this way! Traditional fossil fuel stocks are not infinite at all. Apart from that, environmental pollution is also spreading in Dedarse by using all that energy. Where will the electricity to survive in the future come from?
There are many alternatives. Keoba says that nuclear power is hot in the hand and once a reactor is built, it will be safe for several decades. Where is the 'viable' alternative to keeping global warming below 1.5 degrees Celsius?
But so far no problem, but the challenge is coming right after that. We need to choose a road that does not emit harmful greenhouse gases as a by-product, but is also cost-effective. Even if these two conditions are fulfilled at the same time, we are not at all relieved. Whichever path is actually chosen, it should also remain functional for many years. In all these restrictions, the nuclear reactors around the world are not even able to pass the letter marks.
Not only are they old, but commissioning new re-actors is also a matter of great expense. Compared to the money and time it takes to build a reactor on top of it, its lifespan is not that long.
Now let's look at the fleet of expenses. The US Energy Information Agency calculates that while it costs $30 to $40 on average to produce 1 megawatt-hour of wind energy, solar costs only slightly more, at $50. But nuclear reactors cost at least three times that, averaging $151 (112-189). time? For a new reactor, the planning-to-operation (PTO) period averages 14 to 20 years, according to experts. Because it takes so much time to build a nuclear reactor, it is thought that it will cost in the initial plan, but in reality, the cost is many times higher than that!
Therefore, whether you accept David Schumacher's argument or not, it can be said for sure that the popularity of nuclear reactors is on the decline all over the world. It is not that there is no silver line. No one will say that it does not emit any greenhouse gas. Someone will say again, not that it does not come out at all, but very little comes out.
However, if greenhouse gases are an aspect of relief, then an account of what lies on the side of discomfort has already been given above. It would be reasonable to choose a new path by balancing the two, which is the conundrum that policymakers in major countries are now spinning.
Experts claim that instead of building a nuclear reactor running on nuclear fusion technology, a nuclear reactor running on nuclear fission technology can be built with a more advanced technology. Where pollution is very low, but cost is somewhat high. In Britain, several reactors running on this technology could be operational by 2040.
While the new technology is cost-effective, it is environmentally friendly, with very little greenhouse gas emissions, arguing that power generation from nuclear reactors is the only way forward for the world in the future, says Faith Rare, executive director of the International Energy Agency. Now whether to keep Shyam or not to keep Kool, the whole world is suffering from that dilemma.
Translation: Sudeepta Tarafdar Source: This time
Things to do to prevent Corona virus
# stay at home all the time.
# Follow the rules and use mask when going out for emergency.
# three-layer surgical mask can be washed if desired.
# wash clothes after coming home from outside. Or hang it without shaking for at least four hours.
# Wash hands thoroughly (for at least 20 seconds) with soap or liquid before coming outside.
# plastic PPE or eyes, face, head must be washed thoroughly with detergent and dried after one use.
# Wear PPE made of cloth or clean as described.
# Use a head cap that completely covers the hair.
# Those who have sneeze cough should follow all the rules promulgated by the government. Also, wash hands as directed before and after handling food items, keys, switches, mice, remote controls, mobiles, watches, computer desks, TVs, etc. and after using the bathroom. Those who have dry hands use Moisture after washing their hands. Soap or hand liquid can be used. Why can this virus remain in the crackle (cracked part) of dry hands? Avoid using highly alkaline soaps or detergents.
English 
Bengali